×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




You have to write them somewhere in case you can't reach the SQL server.

Direct communication from a trigger strikes me as a bad idea in general.
Consider there's no way to handle a set of changes being rolled back; as
the trigger doesn't get called again. Unless ARDGATE supports distributed
transactions (XA)?

Charles

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:05 PM, D*B <dieter.bender@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So why create a duplicate file
with all entries just so you can queue up trigger entries?



for the trigger version, you don't need a duplicate file, just write the
changes immediate to SQL Server, ArdGate is fast enough and scales very
well.

D*B
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.