Re: Naming standard for indexes -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Naming standard for indexes
From: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:53:39 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Our file names generally end with a P for Physical, Lnn (L01 L02 L03 etc) for logicals. We've more or less adopted Xnn (X01 X02 X03 etc) for indexes. But it's not a hard and fast rule-- some indexes use the L1 2 3 naming.

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
.

At 11:43 AM -0400 6/28/14, Charles Wilt wrote:

ÐAll,

I'm just curious as to what naming standards if any you follow for indexes.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Naming standard for indexes , Gary Thompson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.