× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Chuck: I'm in a state of hands-on learning here so please bear with me. I only need data files (PF & LF) from 1 library and creating the SAVF is easy and doesn't take a great amount of time. How is this different from the Virtual Tape file and how do I go about creating this? Once the Virtual Tape file is created, how do I transfer to the other box? Using FTP, I use the PUT command. Are you referring to something else?

(You always give such good detailed explanations so I know I'll learn something here.)

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CRPence
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 1:30 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Data Transfer

On 05 Sep 2013 07:59, Don Wereschuk wrote:
I'm having a problem transferring current data from a production box
to our development box. I've tried using FTP but I'm having issues
with this. First I did a SAVF on the library <<SNIP>>
100 GB of data to transfer. My problem is that in using FTP it is
taking about 3 hrs. to FTP 16 GB of data. This would result in a time
of almost 20 hrs. to transfer the 100 GB. Is there a faster way to do
this or is using a tape backup and physically delivering it to the
other machine the fastest way? I only have a window of approx. 4-5
hrs. Any and all suggestions are appreciated.

Writing to a Save File is considerably slower [at least according to past discussions] than writing a binary stream or binary non-save-file [i.e. database] fixed-length records. Thus switching from using SAVF to using Virtual Tape files is probably a better\faster choice. Plus, the choice of what to save in any one save request would no longer be limited to one library per save as required when using save files.

I would suggest testing\timing a transfer of the 16GB save file data again, but PUT the file data into a stream file. The timing of that request would give a better idea of how much faster the transfer of the same saved data could be effected using virtual tape images than when using a save-file; i.e. the difference should imply the overhead of writing save file records vs writing non-record\binary stream data.

--
Regards, Chuck
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.