×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Rob,
The system will allow you to do normal administrative tasks, to a point,
so in your example you could do that. It's like some of the governors
they put on the systems awhile back for 5250 except for DB/2.
Administration OK, normal workload, not so much.
The answer is yes this fits your environment where you have workloads
separated out quite nicely.
I would want to compare this offering to an 720 four way at a P05 to see
which is more cost effective ( unless you need more memory than the
limits on that system ). In that case sizing could be critical to get
right.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 7/22/2013 3:06 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Let's say I have several lpars. And I've done a pretty good job of saying
this lpar of IBM i runs Domino and WAS stuff, while this lpar runs ERP.
Would this be a good fit for licensing the Domino and/or WAS based lpars
with the Application Server (non DB2) license? Does that really kill all
DB2 type stuff? Can I no longer even do a DSPUSRPRF to an outfile and
iNav run sql scripts against it?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
