|
I think branding is the issue in the choice of a name like "IBM i". It just doesn't have the concreteness of a name such as AS/400 or System/38 or PDP11. "Watson" is better branding. "Silverlake" is good too. If forms an image in your head. There is something ambiguous and ephemeral about "IBM i on Power". It does not roll off the tongue or stick in one's memory. It doesn't create an image that one can focus on. I have used the terms 'Power 7' and 'IBM i' when talking with coworkers, both in IT and other departments. Neither term sticks with them. The term most often used and understood by the office staff is 'the 400'.
Paul
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.