SAN to SAN replication without the need for IASP if at all possible.--
I need localized HA with remote side continuous. I don't mind IASP
but was trying to see where the comparisons go as well as the price.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Oberholtzer<
What are you trying to accomplish? One provides for a separate
system and storage, the other common storage (that is replicated
by the storage
manager) and separate systems. One's aimed at High Availability
ones aimed at Continuous availability.
PowerHA is cheaper, but has the drawback of requiring iASPs.
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 1/31/2013 12:20 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
> Has anyone installed this, pros/cons. I have been reading therequirements
> and they seem lengthy as well as pricey. Is there any realwhere
significant > gains to doing LPM 'vs' POWER-HA. A major
requirement for LPM is SAN
> POWER-HA could be either or from what I am reading.--
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.