Re: loopback or loopback which will connect?

[Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just as a matter of practice, why not have a DNS and name your servers 
with some sort of naming convention?  That gives you a whole menu of 
standard choices.  It eases internal communication among staff and it 
makes path names clearer.

My personal choice is to use gods and then use Thor for the big guy in 
the DNS' constellation.    :)




On 1/29/2013 8:01 PM, DrFranken wrote:
> Background: IBM i 7.1 partition with LOTS of PHP using the previously
> included Easycom DB connector. Because all database access is local
> every connection is defined to 'localhost'.  This of course makes the
> code easily portable to other servers and means any changes to IP won't
> affect these connections. All the code is working marvelously and has
> been for some time on POWER5.
>
> Three weeks ago we applied the current stack of PTFs to the partition.
> After the IPL some scripts failed. Just some and in each case the
> failure was the connection to the database. Since nothing had changed
> this was very puzzling. Developers finally tried replacing loopback with
> 127.0.0.1 in the failing scripts. This worked. After fixing a few
> scripts, all seemed well.
>
> A couple weeks later we took a full save and restored it to POWER7.
> Nothing worked at all. Well that turned out to be the Easycom software
> needing a key, simple enough to fix that but even after that more
> scripts were failing with the connection problem but this time it was
> many more. We decided to fall back to the POWER5 server which was still
> running.
>
> After bringing up the partition from dedicated system virtually EVERY DB
> connection was now failing. In every case replacing localhost with
> 127.0.0.1 solved the problem.  Traces were sent to IBM who's primary
> response has been: "Everything looks correct."
>
> After a few days we discovered a note about loopback and IPV6. This
> brought to mind some posts on Midrange-L that referenced incorrect
> configuration of IPV6 causing problems. So we simply shut down the IPV6
> loopback since we weren't using IPV6 and had Never configured any of it.
>
> Shazaam! Both the POWER7 and POWER5 servers immediately behaved
> correctly and all scrip references to localhost work. We've informed IBM
> but so far they've not responded to that piece of information.
>
> Apparently some connections attempted to get to the IPV6 loopback and
> something in the PTFs and/or IPL caused more or fewer connections to
> attempt IPV6 vs IPV4 connections.
>
> So two things:
>
> 1) Have others ran into this seemingly random connection failure problem
> with loopback while IPV6 is active?
>
> 2) A suggestion that if you are NOT using IPV6 turning it off to prevent
> that land-mine from being discovered.
>
>           - Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
>
> www.frankeni.com
> www.iDevCloud.com
> www.iInTheCloud.com