Re: BRMS - full save with least amount of restricted time

[Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, but that does not get quite to the bare metal back up a Winders box 
does while it's running.  The fact that recoverability is at best 
questionable is of no matter.

The problem we run into with these discussions is comparing two 
completely different architectures with each other.  Folks want the good 
part of a old file based technology (Windows)  they spend serious money 
supporting to avoid things we just take for granted on IBM i.  So the 
best route is to exit stage left, and not bother with the discussion 
since there is no way to convince the Windows aficionado's  that Windows 
technology is inferior to start with, therefore not comparable.

Exiting stage left.....

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 1/22/2013 1:01 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
> Are you comfortable enough with this?
> Using save-while-active with network server storage spaces
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/rzaiu/rzaiusavewhileactivestoragespace.htm?resultof=%22%71%66%70%6e%77%73%73%74%67%22%20
> With that in mind you should be able to do a save while active of a
> guested lpar.
>
> I'm no SAN guru on doing back up's that way (if possible).
>
> Isn't there some newer BRMS feature to work with a snapshot of the system?
>
>
>
> Rob Berendt