× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. September 2011

RE: Classes for IBMi/iSeries?

<snip>
My argument is that the "normal" user could still be calling it a S/36 if
all they are doing is BPCS 2.1 (or earlier) migrated.
</snip>
In which case they probably ought to keep calling it a S/36. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:42 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Classes for IBMi/iSeries?

As much as I'd love to see this die...
There are obvious differences between the generations. Even from the normal
users perspective.
- TCP/IP. Opened up opportunities like email upon certain actions,
consuming WSDL's etc. Hosting websites.
- Support for Domino. This sold these machines to LOTS of new
installations.

My argument is that the "normal" user could still be calling it a S/36 if
all they are doing is BPCS 2.1 (or earlier) migrated.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.