Re: Which Spool Files Actually Printed?

Chill. . . It was an honest question. . . Wanted to see what I had missed. My post doesn't invalidate your points, but the fact that it also is not idyllic and not to be done practically without a program needed (I believe) to be expressed.

I actually had been up - as I usually am - quite some time before posting. _my_ mood is good.
--
Sent from my Galaxy tablet phone with with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

"CRPence" <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 02-Jun-2011 03:30 , Dennis Lovelady wrote:

<ed: add attribution> CRPence wrote the day before:

Perhaps "better", since instead of a program to process those
additional data queue entries, a DSPJRN can be performed to
produce results [specific to those batch jobs] directed to an
output file, then a report produced against just the specific
information generated or selecting and reporting about only the
information of interest.

Sorry... but you're suggesting this is better because it doesn't
require a program? What is the basis? It is choice, of course, but
I like the DQ approach much better because it is event-related,
whereas the DSPJRN is after the fact and relatively clumsy. <<SNIP>>

Whatever. Somebody apparently woke up too early or on the wrong side
of the bed, both for having temporarily forgotten the meaning of both
/perhaps/ and "scare quotes" and for having missed the emphasized
concern from the OP about having to process *every* status for *every*
OUTQ. I apologize too, for offering any comment then... and now.

Regards, Chuck
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.