I highly recommend the LTO4, and not the LTO5. First off, the tapes are
cheaper, secondly if you have older LTO tapes (like 2 and 3) you can read
them. You can also write LTO3 & 4. You don't need the capacity of the
LTO5, and when you look at the cost of those tapes you will wish you had
LTO4. Now, vs 4mm, I think that the LTO4 is a great technology. Very fast,
very reliable, and certainly dense enough to hold any P05 class 720 machine.
Pete
--
Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com
Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093
iTech Solutions because IBM i (AS/400s) didn't come with System
Administrators
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry C. Adams
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:55 AM
To: Midrange-L
Subject: Which Tape Drive?
Getting back to our Power 7 proposal, an LTO5 and 4MM have been proposed as
alternatives. I see LTO mentioned all of the time in the list, but the cost
of the 4MM is about $2k less. So what would be the downside/advantage of
going to the cheaper 4MM?
Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them
unsafe. - Frank Rizzo, major of Philadelphia
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070
midrange.com
