Re: Is TPM's Linux vs. IBM i pricing comparison valid?

I didn't see a mention of hardware/software contracts and what these might
cost, I would think you would want these whether SUSE or RedHat. What about
tools to convert from DB2 to MYSQL. I just recently started working with
LINUX and using MYSQL. I don't see allot of the midrange ERP vendors
offering LINUX ERP solutions where to convert from one platform to another
would be as easy as flipping a switch. So is the just of all of this to
prove that the TCO of LINUX on X64 would be far less than on I, seems like
allot of intangable costs that might be missing.

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Michael Ryan
And those are all reasons why i sales are through the roof, and the
industry trend is to move away from Linux/UNIX/Windows and to i.

Do I detect a bit of sarcasm, there? Therein lies the irony, and the rub.
We
have people in our local user group who are considering migrating their
applications to Linux. They site cost as an incentive. At least TPM
extends
himself to compare "supported" versions of Linux and open-source DB
products to
IBM i, under the rationale that most organizations would license supported
versions.. Supported versions cost $. Seems like a reasonable comparison.
But
my concern is that TPM throws in the extra $250/user under IBM i, which
gives
them a robust set of desktop and server interfaces that can't be matched
under
Linux, if I understand correctly.

-Nathan



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.