Re: Cannot Add a logical file member. Not sure why

[Nick_Radich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi Pete,

There is a Command in TAATOOLS that will give you a report that shows all 
LF that are not in the same library that the PF is in.

I am moving from a 620 at V4R5 to an 810 at V5R4 and this Command has 
helped me.  I was lucky, there are only 3 files that I have to worry 
about.  But one of the LF is in my Test Environment and points to the PF 
in Production.  I "may" have to take a look at this one.

As for the Level Check, I believe if you Add a Field, or Change the 
Attributes of a Field, it will change the Level Indicator.




Thanx,

Nick



Nick Radich
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
EPC Molding, Inc.
Direct  (320) 679-6683
Toll free  (800) 388-2155  ext. 6683
Fax  (320) 679-4516
nick_radich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



From:   Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:     midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:   10/27/2010 04:09 PM
Subject:        Re: Cannot Add a logical file member. Not sure why
Sent by:        midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



"See you in May?" Absolutely!

As for the logical /physical file issue. It's not huge.  A nuisance. 
But helpful to know if I run into this again, I'll need recreate the 
logical.

As a follow up: If the source for the logical hasn't changed and the 
file is recompiled, does it cause a level check?  I have always been 
fuzzy on what causes the level indicator to change on a compiled file.

Pete Helgren
Value Added Software, Inc
www.asaap.com
www.opensource4i.com


On 10/27/2010 2:47 PM, Vern Hamberg wrote:
> LOL Pete - you've been unlucky enough to use only good habits in where
> your PFs and LFs go! You've not considered trying the naughty bits that
> are discussed in the manuals!
>
> I suspect that IBM won't change this, since it has been this way
> forever. But you can always submit a requirement at the COMMON site -
> under members, look for the requirements page - membership not required,
> just get a user and password.
>
> See you in May?
> Vern
>
> On 10/27/2010 3:08 PM, Pete Helgren wrote:
> > It's the first time I have come across it.  I have never seen a case
> > where the logical and physical didn't reside in the same library but
> > then, I have only been around the box for 30 years or so and have lived
> > a sheltered life  ;-)
> >
> > Yeah, it makes sense on one level.  Maybe an additional parameter on 
the
> > create duplicate object for *file types would be helpful.
> >
> > Pete Helgren
> > Value Added Software, Inc
> > www.asaap.com
> > www.opensource4i.com
> -snip-