It sounds like you are doing software Encryption, and that is VERY VERY CPU
intensive. So, it would make sense that on your smallest partitions (those
without a lot of CPW), it would improve the backup time.
Pete
Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com
Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hart, Doug - EI
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:03 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Backup Performance
We have always done a full system save (like opt 21) on the weekends using
BRMS. For sometime now we have been encrypting our tapes via our LTO4 tape
library. These were always done in Restricted State. Well we talked with
our auditors and got the OK to not encrypt the OS and other IBM ("Q...")
libraries. This greatly helps simplify the restore of the system (we do
practice D/R). We only need to encrypt our company's data. So we have
modifyed our BRMS control groups again so now we save (encrypted) all of the
*ALLUSR and IFS 1st. What I did differently is code (API) a step that ends
all active subsystems EXCEPT QCTL for the encrypted save. Then we go
restricted and get the remainder of the system.
OK, if you followed me so far here is the question. We have a number of
LPARs on several systems. All at v5r4 and using fiber to the tape library.
Our backups are running faster and we're not sure why. The most dramatic
change has been on our smaller partitions, ones with little CPU and memory
allocated. I'm talking ½ the outage window, 12 hours down to 6 hours. My
1st thought was maybe the difference in not going down to an actual
Restricted State was the *SHRPOOL memory was being better allocated to the
backup job. But this doesn't seem to be the case. Remember that only QCTL
is running and BRMS is still doing the save.
I talked with Support Line work management and didn't get much. They
suggested using the Flight Recorder to monitor the backups. They looked at
this differently, saying that maybe the old procedure was slower than it
should have been and we just corrected some long standing issue in our shop.
We have double checked the backups and we are getting everything, it's not
like we are only saving half of or systems.
So, anyone out there want to offer a suggestion as to why our outage window
is so much improved?
Douglas Hart - Principal Consultant
________________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
sender.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT
Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by
any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
midrange.com
