|
Hi, Booth:
Did your company upgrade the system to V6R1?
Perhaps they did not run STROBJCVN for all of the user libraries (containing all of the application programs, etc.)?
This timing difference could be due to the automatic conversion of programs on "first call" ... that would easily explain why all subsequent calls, by any user in any job, are much faster.
Hope that helps,
Mark S. Waterbury
> Booth Martin wrote:
This doesn't make sense to me.
Here is what we're doing: We are running a program with this H-spec: H option(*nodebugio) dftactgrp(*no) actgrp(*new)
The first session runs for about 4 minutes before displaying data. Every session after that, whether from the same user or another user, displays the same data in under 6 seconds. Even if all instances of the program are ended, restarting a session is under 6 seconds.
30 to 40 spool files are generated by the process.
What could possibly be different between the first time and the subsequent times?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.56/2302 - Release Date: 08/14/09 06:10:00
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.