× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yep, but i'm not in the US. PCI doesn't apply since credit cards aren't common here.
We have no aequivalent to SOX, and what is HIPAA in the US isn't as formalized here.

I can certainly understand that your customers may not be *legally required* to follow PCI (or other) standards. What they will soon find is that the companies that do follow these requirements may no longer be able to do business with companies that do not. Then it will become a business decision.

Regards,

Scott Ingvaldson
Senior IBM Support Specialist
Midwest Region Data Center
Fiserv.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lukas Beeler [mailto:lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:45 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: IPL hangs at C900 2967, PTF SI30387 on a V5R4 system

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 22:40, Ingvaldson, Scott<scott.ingvaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's a different world now.  Your customer can't sell that philosophy to his auditor, PCI, SOX or HIPAA either.  That's why he's calling you.

Yep, but i'm not in the US. PCI doesn't apply since credit cards aren't common here. We have no aequivalent to SOX, and what is HIPAA in the US isn't as formalized here.

Certainly this is true, but I think that it's premature to call this one IBM's mistake.

I don't think it is.

See Chuck's very detailed explanation for details of some possibilities, but the vast majority of PTF installation issues are user issues rooted in things that may have been done incorrectly (or simply in a "non-supported" way,) years previously.

Back in 2006, i setup and deployed that machine. Installed OS and latest CUM, both according to IBM documentation - no test PTFs, or PTFs that were marked as defective were installed. Since then, nobody has touched it. Then, i tried installing the latest CUM according to IBM's documentation. It didn't work.

Again: I don't think it's a big deal. Mistakes happen. It would be foolish to expect that everything coming from IBM just works flawlessly. Just look at the troubles the IBM i on JS12 Users face.

--
Read my blog at http://projectdream.org


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.