× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




On 25/04/2009, at 9:16 PM, Richard Schoen wrote:

I would vote for spending the time getting more comfortable with
QHELL/PASE over re-writing an application that already works fine as- is.

The problem with this approach is that lazy vendors will provide applications that "run" on OS/400 but really don't. They will be Unix applications running in PASE **pretending** to be OS/400 applications. IBM has done a good job of integrating PASE with OS/400 so you can capture PASE output and process natively however PASE is like the Win3.1 environment provided with OS/2. Lazy vendors said they supported OS/2 when they really only provided a Win3.1 application that ran in a Win3,1 environment. This was a significant factor in killing OS/2.

You can already see this happening with IBM products (such as Tivoli and Websphere) and 3rd-Party products such as Zend. There are others. It's the thin end of the wedge and will contribute to the death of our much loved system. The only reason they get away with it is because to most people, especially users, the interface is the application. If that runs in a web browser or in a client of some sort then the back- end becomes unimportant to them. It is the technicians trying to create a stable environment while fighting with the vagaries of WinDOS, Unix, etc. that suffer and as a result so does the company paying for it.

If you allow PASE and QSHELL applications to supplant native applications, not only do you get a truly ugly command interface, but you start to remove much of the reason for choosing OS/400 in the first place. AIX applications running in PASE take almost no advantage of OS/400. Once all your so-called OS/400 applications are really PASE applications you have to ask why am I running these on AS/400-iSeries- System i-etc. Why not just move them to an AIX box or some other variant of Unix supported by the application vendor? Especially if you already own the necessary hardware and OS for some other "mission- critical" application.

Be very wary of relying on PASE applications. You are helping drive nails in your own coffin.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.