RE: HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Thanks everyone (Elvis, Jeff, Eric) for the quick responses. We will be
installing this soon and I'll let the list know what kind of batch job
improvements we see.

Glenn

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elvis Budimlic
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:27 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1

Based on the feedback I've gotten from our customers, it was nothing but
praise for option 42. Never heard of any downsides.

HTH, Elvis

Celebrating 11-Years of SQL Performance Excellence on IBM i5/OS and
OS/400
www.centerfieldtechnology.com

-----Original Message-----
Subject: HA Journal Performance - Option 42 of 5722SS1

Hi -

We are considering installing option 42 of OS/400, HA Journal
Performance. Our question is whether there is any risk in doing this.
Could installing and using the Journal Caching for our busy production
journals have any downside?

I know that if we have an unplanned outage we can, and probably would,
lose some transactions, but we are willing to take that risk.

TIA,
Glenn Birnbaum

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.