For some info on Mark Shearer..
http://blogs.systeminetwork.com/isnblogs/maxedout/2008/01/mark_shearer_s
till_in_play.html
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Ignorance
It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when no
one has any idea where they're going.
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If it did, it would be
folded, mutilated, watered down, politically corrected, and would show
up a week later if at all. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them,
nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Nelson
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:40 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Marketing the platform was: System i - Mentioned twice in
IBM needs to make it possible for those who provide services to have an
incentive to sell the machine. I'm still waiting to collect on my bet
with
Mark Shearer that there are probably a thousand different "contract
programmers" out there who would like an 800 number to call and place an
order for a box. No muss, no fuss, no "Business Partner".
They are concerned that when the slick BP's show up, they will be pushed
aside.
I have been proposing this kind of thing for years, and was ignored
until
Mr. Shearer assigned one of his lieutenants to work on this. The guy's
name
was Kurt something or other. We spoke on the phone one time after the
Minneapolis COMMON conference, and then he disappeared. After leaving
him
about 10 voice mail messages with no response, I gave up.
Speaking of disappearances, what happened to Mr. Shearer?
Paul Nelson
Office 512-392-2577
Cell 708-670-6978
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:49 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Marketing the platform was: System i - Mentioned twice in
Joe,
A couple of things on this tack. IBM needs to sort out it's business
partner program. And they need to do it quickly. It hasn't been able
to keep up with all the changes in the platform over the past few
years. The biggest issue is barriers to entry. It is so hard to become
a BP and so difficult to maintain that IBM loses sales while prospective
BP's are jumping through the vast array of hoops (VAE's) to become a HW
reseller. They commoditized the hardware but the channel is still
proprietary. They need to fix that, IMHO (and I have been saying that
for a few years)
As an ISV, I like to sell a complete, end to end solution, so
simplifying the HW reseller end would make my life a lot easier. Even
though I always lead with i, most of my apps are hardware agnostic so I
could, potentially, sell any platform: No problem with x (or any white
box). Harder with p, and most difficult with i. I can sell the
reliability of i but the difficulty in sourcing and pricing a box is a
bit of a challenge.
IBM has great ISV resources and gives us quite a bit of technical help
in developing apps and also has some good marketing tools to help market
our products. The key is help in differentiating the i from the other
platforms and then making it easy to bundle a box and an application.
My 2 cents.
Pete Helgren
Joe Pluta wrote:
Don wrote:
Joe wrote:
What's needed is to get the ISVs back on board.
=======
Joe, this is most likely the most important transitional step
mentioned
yet.
The applications drive the directions... the application drivers need
to
be
moving more in that direction, staying with the o/s(platform), and
continue
development/support.
Yup, and there are a variety of options. I don't like them all
technically, but they're there, ranging from pure RPG-CGI, which you
can
do with RDi and nothing else, or a PHP-based environment where you pay
Zend for their tooling, or an SOA-based offering using EGL and
RDi-SOA,
or even a completely J2EE-based architecture using RDi and RAD.
The options are endless. And I've got demos that show that the basic
architecture flies (at least the J2EE side, and Nathan can attest to
the
pure RPG side, although his stuff is proprietary). I'm getting 12
pages
a SECOND on an EGL-based inquiry; it's nearly impossible to match that
in a JDBC environment. But that part of the discussion veers once
again
into opinion (which architecture to use).
We need to prove to ISVs that the platform will sell software, and I
think we're at the point where we can. But we need to focus on the
right issues.
Joe
midrange.com
