|
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gibbs" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't WDSC include SCM?
>> Sounds like an opportunity for a new SCM vendor to enter the scene...
>> Or, perhaps this could be a community project and offered as open
>> source (courtesy of midrange.com)....
>
> Sadly, I'm afraid I can't do that. There is a small mater of conflict
> of interest.
Given your conflicting position, maybe you could make the case with your
team about the need to a package that suits the small shops too?
As much as I liked working with change management (Turnover) in a prior
life, we would never be able to justify the cost for our 3 man shop. And in
many (most) ways it would be overkill.
I would be happy with a 'Source Control Manager' that simply did two things:
1 - Allow source to be checked in/locked & checked out/unlocked by developer
with change notes
2 - Maintain a revisions library to allow us to see prior copies
I just want to avoid source code contention and have a complete history.
It is something we would pay for from a vendor, or contribute to the design
and coding of if it were an open source project.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.