Re: IPDS printer option worthyness -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Sounds good Pat. I appreciate the opinion, I was looking for more tangible
arguments so I could form my own.

The gateway option previously mentioned also sounds intreging to an
extent, but I lothe adding "external" complexity/cost, and would rather
purchase "real" printers (for a low number of printers anyway, I'm sure
there would be a tipping point where I would opt for a gateway approach)
-----midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----

To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 07/05/2007 01:34PM
Subject: Re: IPDS printer option worthyness

Volume is the key...

HPT will handle a lot of situations, but certainly not all.

IPDS still remains the gold standard for advanced printing.

Tom Kreimer wrote:
> We are changing to a single print vendor for all our locations and

> will be replacing most every printer (corporate has already made this

> decision, I don't need any recommendations for vendors!). Some of our

> printers are IPDS printers now, but most use host print transform to

>regular old PCL printers.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.