Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source

I've thought about doing that.  Anyone aware of (or been bit by) any
gotcha's with Activation Groups and mixing CLP & CLLE with OPM RPG's? 
Scoping on overrides comes to mind as a concern.  We've cleaned up the
OVRPRTF's to *JOB over the years but probably not the OVRDBF's

vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx 01/31/2007 2:51:41 PM >>>

Just compiling as a CLLE will give performance benefits.

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

Booth Martin wrote: 

CLP source vs. CLLE source 

I would like to read a general discussion in this area, 
so my question is quite general: 

Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP? Or 
CLP over CLLE? 

The only time I ever used ILE CL was when I needed to make 
an ILE bound call to a CL procedure. 

-- 
JHHL 
-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing

list 

To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, 
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l 
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives 
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.