× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2007

Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source

So far it sounds like CLP works most of the time, CLLE works all of the time and performs better? Therefore should I conclude that using CLLE is always desirable? 

vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Just compiling as a CLLE will give performance benefits.
-------------- Original message -------------- From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Booth Martin wrote:
CLP source vs. CLLE source I would like to read a general discussion in this area, so my question is quite general: Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP? Or CLP over CLLE?
The only time I ever used ILE CL was when I needed to make an ILE bound call to a CL procedure. 
--
JHHL --

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.