RE: CLP source vs. CLLE source

Basically for the same reason some use RPG ILE model vs RPG OPM model.

By using a CLLE and binding modules together, you can validate at program 
creation time 
that the modules will work together (parameters) or else they won't bind.

Plus,  if by chance someone changes a CLP by adding a parameter and forgets to 
update PGMC, 
PGMC will fail.

By binding CLLE module, and changing the module, until an UPDPGM is issued the 
program 
will continue to work even though the module has changed.

This is just one example, there are more.

Sharon Wintermute


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:12 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: CLP source vs. CLLE source


CLP source vs. CLLE source

I would like to read a general discussion in this area, so my question 
is quite general:

Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP?  Or CLP over CLLE?