RE: EDI outsourcing Was: EDI translation/mapping packages

In our case, both.  We focus on what the client needs.  If all he wants is
for someone to receive EDI and email him a report of his PO, we can do that,
if he wants a file that can be imported to his system and then dump us a
file to send EDI out, we can do that too.  While full system integration is
great, it is not what everyone needs.
cjg 


Carl J. Galgano
EDI Consulting Services, Inc.
770-422-2995
www.ediconsulting.com
 
600 Kennesaw Avenue
Suite 400 
Marietta, GA  30060

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces+cgalgano2=ediconsulting.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces+cgalgano2=ediconsulting.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:32 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: EDI outsourcing Was: EDI translation/mapping packages

Curious, when one outsources EDI are they trying to get the worlds slowest,
most expensive fax machine just so they meet customer demands, or, are they
getting a system that actually integrates inbound and outbound EDI with
their ERP or other backend software?

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Phil Kestenbaum" <pkestenbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/26/2007 03:11 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: EDI translation/mapping packages






I would be interested in seeing any analysis comparing the ownership
costs of acquiring said packages vs. an outsourced approach.
Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darrell A Martin
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:00 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: EDI translation/mapping packages

Hi:

I have found the Premenos / Trusted Link / Inovis software to be very 
powerful, and fairly easy to use (as EDI software goes -- ease of use is

compromised by the inherent complexity of dealing with a customer who 
helped invent the spec and thinks they are still supposed to be
inventing 
[grin]). I set the system up from scratch, and still cover for the
current 
EDI Administrator.

We have, however, had a major headache in that the Inovis software's 
PC-based client absolutely insists (their tech people confirm that it is
a 
real requirement) that virtual device workstation entries QPADEV0001 
through ...5 are set up in QPGMR. This causes problems with other
devices 
which try to grab those workstation entries, sometimes stopping Inovis 
from working and sometimes getting access when the QINTER subsystem is 
down. Obviously neither of those is a good thing....

Darrell

Darrell A. Martin  -  630-754-2141
Manager, Computer Operations
dmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 01/26/2007 01:48:22 PM:

I'm partial to Inovis, from using the older Premenos software and

found 
it 

to be very good in terms of AS/400 packages - screen navigation is

easy, 

help text, etc.

This e-mail, including attachments, may contain information that is 
confidential and/or proprietary, and may only be used by the person to 
whom this email is addressed. If the recipient of this e-mail is not the

intended recipient or an authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified

that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is 
prohibited. If this e-mail has been delivered to you in error, please 
notify the sender by replying to this message and deleting this e-mail 
immediately.