Re: SMAPP is killing our 520

Steve,

Will this box be doing this kind of work indefinitely, or is this a
temporary (or periodic) project?

If this will be an ongoing workload, i'd try and scale back the SMAPP
target time to a level where it has an acceptable impact.

If this is a temporary (or periodic) project, i'd turn SMAPP off for the
conversion period to facilitate completing the project (knowing, of course,
that if the box goes down it might be a loooong IPL - which if there is no
other workloads or users, may be an acceptable risk).


                                                                       
             "Steve McKay"                                             
             <steve.mckay@hibb                                       
             ett.com>                                                   To
             Sent by:                  midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx       
             midrange-l-bounce                                          cc
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                          
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: SMAPP is killing our 520    
             01/26/2007 09:42                                          
             AM                                                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
             Please respond to                                         
             Midrange Systems                                          
                 Technical                                             
                Discussion                                             
             <midrange-l@midra                                         
                 nge.com>                                            
                                                                       
                                                                       




The conversion program is wrapped around vendor-supplied I/O routines . . .

"Chris Bipes" <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.291.1169763073.2713.midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Rewrite the conversion program to write to the Physical and have no
access path in the physical.  World of difference.

Christopher Bipes
Information Services Director
CrossCheck, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces+chris.bipes=cross-check.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces+chris.bipes=cross-check.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve McKay
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:57 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SMAPP is killing our 520

Unfortunately, the file I/O is to the logical files not the physicals so
we can't do that . . .

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_____________________________________________________________________________

Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________


ForwardSourceID:NT00061246