|
On 16/01/2007, at 7:46 AM, Peter Dow (ML) wrote:
Do we know whether OS/400 etc expect QTEMP anywhere in particular in thelibrary list?
No, and I'm not sure it even has to be in *LIBL. I asked IBM about QTEMP location some time ago and got back no particular recommendation. I haven't received my append back yet but unless you edited it then it looks like the last few paragraphs got chopped by something. Here they are again:
Only two of these objects are visible via DSPLIB QTEMP. All the rest are internal things.
I expect internal code finds QTEMP from the pointer in the WCB rather than the *LIBL but probably not a good idea to remove QTEMP entirely unless you *KNOW* nothing in the job needs it.
For what it's worth I'm in the "stick QTEMP at the top of *USRLIBL" camp and I think those who put it in *SYSLIBL should be shot.
And who (or what) is BL?
Perhaps this makes more sense now you can see the complete sentence? Regards, Simon Coulter. -------------------------------------------------------------------- FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists http://www.flybynight.com.au/ Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\ Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 \ / X ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
