|
My complaint is with you guys accepting broken as being "normal"....
Forget the style of programming. I don't accept "broken" software - But I am realistic enough to know that as long as it runs on Windows, there is nothing that IBM do that will _ever_ make it 100% bullet proof. I have way more failures with iSeries Access than with WDSC. So given that I have a choice - do I work with it and help IBM to make it better? While getting at least a 75% productivity boost? Or do I refuse to use it until it is perfect and suffer lower productivity with SEU in the meantime? To me it is a no brainer - I do not have enough patience to work with SEU - no matter how many 5250 sessions I have open at a time. Life is to short to use SEU. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.