× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why wouldn't you just switch to
?the remote site if the primary went bad?  Why is the assumption that if
the primary went, the secondary would as well?  Or does your network
still have a single point of failure at the primary site?  Seems a bit
extreme to replicate data, back up off the HA box, and then get that
backed-up data physically back to the primary site if you had to "run
away." 

Like I said, I must be missing something reeeeeealy easy on this one.
Can someone clue me in?  How far away are the sites?  Perhaps that'll
help me. 

I didn't say it was rational, just the requirements that our boss has laid 
out. The HA site is 90 miles away, the third disaster recovery site is 
2000 miles. It is possible that a communications failure or power failure 
affecting the HA site would also effect the primary site.


Steven Morrison
Fidelity Express 
903-885-1283  ext. 479

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.