Re: Saving the System i: Fight Rather Than Switch

[Brian <iserieslists@xxxxxxxxx>]

John,

Since adding windows boxes throws away having a "consolidated-server", would
adding one of the express 520s with the turbo feature turned on be a
possibility? This would give you a 3800 CPW box with only a P10 pricing
level for the software. Also, if you purchased the DASD and possibly the RAM
for this 520 on the used market, you might be able to put together a nice
box for a lot less than adding to the 570. I think it would be easier to
administer multiple i5s than multiple windows boxes.

Just a thought.

Kind regards,

BJ


On 12/9/06, Jones, John (US) <John.Jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "One of the interesting problems is that a major benefit of the System i
> is also it's drawback. "
>
> Agreed.  As I mentioned in another post we need additional capacity for
> running WebSphere App Server.  I don't need additional capacity for
> BRMS, iSeries Access, and so on.  Unfortunately when pricing an iSeries
> solution there's no compensating for that and I'm stuck at $60K/CPU for
> the OS license on top of the CPU activation cost which in itself costs
> twice what a dual-Xeon Wintel box costs.
>
> On single and dual core iSeries, I think a good TCO will show the
> iSeries to be competitive.  But as you scale up, moving to 4 or more
> cores, the value proposition is reduced unless you're workload mix
> scales accordingly.
>
>
> John A. Jones, CISSP
> Americas Information Security Officer
> Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
> V: +1-630-455-2787 F: +1-312-601-1782
> john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx