Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
From: Peter Dow (ML) No, Joe, that's what Walden mentioned that you never answered. What I asked was, is there any quantitative evidence that OS/400 is getting less stable one way or the other. And if so, what would that evidence be? Number of PTFs issued after a new release? Number of PMRs opened by Rob after a new release? Number of emails on this list complaining about problems after a new release?
Here's a measure: how many megabytes of Windows patches do you download on any given week? Compare that to the PTFs for i5/OS. I don't know what the comparison works out to, but it's something you could do.
And as you say, there is a similar question for hardware. It would be nice if we had actual numbers rather than stories on this list about who had to replace what, although that does give a feel for it. Wasn't there a large batch of 10K or maybe 17K drives that had problems?
How about this: what percentage of Windows servers installed in the year 2001 are still running? I'd be amazed if you found one. I know it doesn't answer your question, but it seems like you're fishing when you point to a single five-year old incident. How many Windows servers have gone casters up in that time frame? Joe
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.