× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I've never bought-in to the mirrored kool-aid - I prefer RAID-5.  When
cost is an issue, you're going to have bottlenecks.  And it's true that
IBM charges more out of country than inside the US (usually).  So - be
that as it may, you've got a system with a disk bottleneck and no amount
of CPW will fix that.  You can put a 32-way 595 with 1 TB of RAM on 2
arms and you'll be DYING.  I'll bet lots of body parts on it.  Because
I've done it to prove a point.

And before anyone gets cute, I didn't say 64-way with 2TB because the
limit is 32 processors in a LPAR.  A 64-way 595 with 2 TB of RAM must be
a 2+ LPAR machine.  Trivia for the day. 


--
Justin C. Haase - Solution Engineer
IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i
Kingland Systems Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lukas Beeler
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:11 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Saving the System i: Fight Rather Than Switch

The point I'm making is that I personally would never configure a 
machine with two arms to sell to a customer that I'd have to support
in
the future.  It just doesn't have the performance.

When our sales has the choice between selling no machine and a 2 arm
machine, he will sell the 2 arm machine.

And it's an official IBM offer, so it can't be that wrong. Of course
it's always nicer to have more disks in a system, but the customers
can't/won't pay for it.

Put two more arms in your System i and I **GUARANTEE** you you'll have

markedly better performance.  Don't hit me with a 4-arm Windows box 
against a 2-arm System i.

I've setup a few 4x36GB systems, with mirrored protections. I didn't
notice a speed difference two the 2x36GB Systems. I didn't do any
benchmarks though, so the difference could be just smaller than
"noticeable".

And if by 4 arm you mean 8x36GB when using mirrored protection, the
price point is just even MORE ridiculous. Who will sell upwards to 30k
on a single machine just to get decent performance?

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail communication, including attachments, is 
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is 
confidential, and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient or believe you received this communication in error, please reply to 
the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, 
retention, dissemination, distribution, copying, or otherwise use of the 
information contained in this communication is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.