Model 270 V5R4 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Model 270 V5R4
From: <ldwopt@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 7:29:27 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sensitivity: Normal


I have a client that I will be upgrading V5R1 to V5R3 next week. The original 
plans were to upgrade also to V5R4.    The system is a Model 270 feature code 
2248. Total CPW is 150. IBM is suggesting not to upgrade to V5R4 because IBM 
has not tested the system with V5R4.

Has anyone upgraded a similar system?  I am suggesting to  wait until IBM gives 
the official go ahead.

Thanks in advance
Dave Willenborg
FNTS
Omaha NE

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Model 270 V5R4 , Haase, Justin C.
Re: Model 270 V5R4 , Scott Klement

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.