Re: New 520+ Shipment

[Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@xxxxxxx>]

Are  you  using  Capacity on Demand or  LPARing the 
box  that  you  are  using an HMC?

BTW your chart of  the systems displays fine if you use no 
proportional type  styles like courier.

Glenn

At 01:47 PM 7/6/2006, ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I'll answer some of them... ;)
>
> The additional MES costs are for rack mounting, rack, additional DASD, tape
> controller, tape library, cords, PDUs, HMC, monitor, etc.  Adds up quick!
> The higher figure is with the expansion cabinet and all the extras it
> entails.
>
>
>
>              "Steve Richter"
>              <stephenrichter@g
>              mail.com>                                                  To
>              Sent by:                  "Midrange Systems Technical
>              midrange-l-bounce         Discussion"
>              s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                                                         cc
>
>              07/06/2006 01:38                                      Subject
>              PM                        Re: New 520+ Shipment
>
>
>              Please respond to
>              Midrange Systems
>                  Technical
>                 Discussion
>              <midrange-l@midra
>                  nge.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/6/06, ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It will be a 1 CPU 7143 520+ with 4GB Ram, 8 35gb drives, 1200/60 CPW.
> > Pretty far down the food chain... ;)
> >
> > It will come in around either $60k or $80k after the added MES items
> > depending on the disk controller approach we choose (5727 and 5776 in CEC
> > or 5727 in CEC and 5580 in an 0595 expansion).
>
> guessing you are the "520 express growth RAID ( 7143 )" - $29,797 list
> price.  What would the additional $30-$50K from the base price be for?
>  Domino software?  MES that is an expansion box? Is that for the
> additional drives?  That is why I ask about the 35GB drives.  PC
> drives are much larger. If the drives were 200GB would you need the
> expansion?  I understand the disk arms and all but maybe the large
> disk cache obviates the need for arms.
>
> Dont mind me. You dont have to go into detail or answer at all if your
> worn out :)
>
> ( thanks for the chart. It displays well when I copy/paste into outlook )
>
> -Steve
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
> For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
> _____________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT0004B3BA
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.