|
This might be not quite true - simply turning on commitment control on a journaled PF results in some caching of the journal entries. See the entry at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200305/msg00024.html for more information and a great link to articles by Rick Turner, formerly of IBM. Vern -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Christen, Duane J." <dchristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Actually commitment control has very little to do with journal entries being written, the major difference is that when under commitment control a journal entry for a table will contain the transaction id for that commitment cycle'. If a file is journaled, any journal entries created by the DBMS are written to disk "instantly" (sequentially). If a failure occurs you may loose the DB records that are in mainstore but during the IPL the system will use the journals to rebuild the missing DB changes to the table(s). If you are under commitment control and a rollback is issued, explicitly or implicitly (job ended) the journal entries for that transaction are used to remove the transaction from the table(s) that were part of that transaction. The same occurs on an IPL after a system failure, the journal entries are used to remove the transaction from the table(s). Duane Christen
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.