|
looks like a reliable report. p5 hardware brings in 3x that of i5
hardware. Maybe I should have said profits not revenue. What the p series did for years was to follow the philosophy that if you lost a few $ on each unit you sold you could make it up in volume! It has been the profit margins on the i Series that has kept the p afloat for years. That was acceptable to IBM as a whole because they are now more of a service company than anything and the p Series like all Unix and Windows type boxes generates huge consulting revenues.
...have the technical managers in the i5 division ever gone to IBM
management and told them that look, you are starving our system of investment and we could sell a lot more systems if we were able to make across the board improvements to the OS, ILE and languages on the system? Yes - many times. There is investment going on - but look back at what I said earlier about consulting revenues. How do you justify spending millions of $ on improving the i5 OS and programming languages if the result is that you get less consulting revenue? And by the way - you also get an iSeries community that demands that the price of the box be comparable to the p Series? (You're in that camp Steve - but the i Series profits prop up the p series - so take away the i Series profitability and ...)
... Does IBM management come down on the technical people and say
something like "look how well the .NET framework and CLI language strategy is working for MSFT... I'm not as convinced as you that it is achieving the kind of world domination you seem to see. Also they are now increasingly into an arena where they have to start worrying about backward compatibility - not one of their strong points. IBM bet the farm on Java - pure and simple. That model can be extended to other languages - after all MS CLI is just a variation on the JVM/bytecode theme.
... It is just that with the huge profits MSFT is achieving from the
constant churning of new ideas and products ... MS - new ideas? The last one I can recall was "Bob". Just about everything else is product that they purchased, or as in the case of CLI an adaptation of an existing technology. MS are superb at marketing and have parleyed a monopoly in desktop operating systems into a huge money making machine. Are IBM envious of that - you bet. MS are also envious of IBM's consulting revenues - which is why they are so desperately trying to get into that arena. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com www.RPGWorld.com -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:58 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: MIDRANGE-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1114 Send MIDRANGE-L mailing list submissions to midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at midrange-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of MIDRANGE-L digest..." *** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove all text unrelated to your reply and change the subject line so it is meaningful. Today's Topics: 1. Office objects in DB2 & STRPCCMD (Mike Pantzopoulos - (H/O)) 2. Re: Hypervisor message (Dan) 3. Re: Hypervisor message (Larry Bolhuis) 4. Promethius - Did we miss something here.... (Don) 5. Re: STRDBG/ENDDBG required to prevent Java open exception (Peter Dow (ML)) 6. Saving spool files in *SAVF (paramasivam.murugesan@xxxxxxxxx) 7. RE: Saving spool files in *SAVF (Kevin Wright) 8. Re: Prometheus (Steve Richter) 9. AW: How to have multiple views of subfile data? (Hauser, Birgitta) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- message: 1 date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:58:45 +1000 from: "Mike Pantzopoulos - \(H/O\)" <mpantzopoulos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: Office objects in DB2 & STRPCCMD I have been playing with the STRPCCMD to invoke WORD via a vbscript script, and to pass in substitution values. During my web meanderings trying to gather information on this integration I came across one reference which implied that an Office object could be stored in a BLOB field in DB2, but only by using SQL INSERT. Unfortunately I can't find this item again, but am desperate for some information on how the BLOB column contents (say a Word document) can then be rendered on the user's PC presumably by placing it in the IFS temporarily and firing up WORD with the path/document name. I am waiting for the iSeries/Ofice integration book from MC Press, but would like to create a proof of concept now. Any other references people know about? I have scanned the usual places. I am fighting a civil war at my site trying to convince the boss that we can do everything we need on the iSeries rather than fragmenting our department into a myriad of machines & platform. So I need to get this proof of concept working soon. Thanks.... Mike Pantzopoulos EIG-Ansvar Limited Tel : 61 (3) 8630 3193 Fax: **************************************************************************** ***************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please reply using the sender's email address. This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned for computer viruses. EIG-Ansvar Limited does not accept liability for any loss or damage, whether caused by our own negligence or not, that results from a computer virus or defect in the transmission of this email or any attached file. EIG-Ansvar Limited - Australia (A.B.N. 21 007 216 506) Email : insure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Eig-Ansvar Limited - New Zealand Email : insure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************************************** ***************************** ------------------------------ message: 2 date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:42:33 -0400 from: Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: Hypervisor message Thanks Rob! I need to remember that the midrange.com archives are not the exclusive definitive source for answers! - Dan ------------------------------ message: 3 date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:33:54 -0400 from: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: Hypervisor message They aren't? RATS! Somebody mentioned to me goo something once... Hmmm. :-) Dan wrote:
Thanks Rob! I need to remember that the midrange.com archives are not the exclusive definitive source for answers! - Dan
-- Larry Bolhuis IBM eServer Certified Systems Expert: Vice President iSeries Technical Solutions V5R3 Arbor Solutions, Inc. iSeries LPAR Technical Solutions V5R3 1345 Monroe NW Suite 259 iSeries Linux Technical Solutions V5R3 Grand Rapids, MI 49505 iSeries Windows Integration Technical Solutions V5R3 IBM eServer Certified Systems Specialist (616) 451-2500 iSeries System Administrator for OS/400 V5R3 (616) 451-2571 - Fax AS/400 RPG IV Developer (616) 260-4746 - Cell iSeries System Command Operations V5R2 If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier. ------------------------------ message: 4 date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:03:17 -0400 from: Don <dr2@xxxxxxxx> subject: Promethius - Did we miss something here.... Caveat: this comment is based on conjecture founded in current industry trends and skuttlebut. It is conjecture. But: We may have missed something here. As is being currently discussed on M-L, for a promethius sized (proposed by rumour) system to come forward would not necessarily lend itself to a production environment. Perhaps it's not intended to be a production box. Where have linux and Microsoft killed os/400(et al names)? In the education/school systems. We know from trends that people bring to the job marketplace and business marketplace the skillsets they learn in school. That's what they hire, buy and use. That's a big B-school case study in 3 sentences. We also know that IBM is starting a DB2 push initiative into the college systems, most predominately in the SE, Appalachians, etc. Do to this, they will need a DB2 box the size of a laptop or small desktop with appropriate horsepower to keep student/faculty interest. It will also have to be priced comparably to the competition(take your pic of platforms/OS's). The conjecture, based on discourse here and Trevor's blog, etc, would lend credibility to the idea that IBM may be creating a lower end, DB2 system that will replace the "huggable luggable" of old and be targeted to the educational space. Again, this is conjecture, something I'm on record of late as not appreciating much of when it comes to vapor marketing. But, it does follow the IBM internal and external trends and directions and it would be one helluva good idea! :) Now, would it sell in Peoria? And, is the conjecture reality. :) Don in DC ------------------------------ message: 5 date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:30:12 -0700 from: "Peter Dow (ML)" <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: STRDBG/ENDDBG required to prevent Java open exception Hi Barbara, I think you're right -- I changed your program into a procedure and added it to Scott K's HSSFR4 service program, and gave it the option of named stream files instead of null just to see if it was using them. The files all got created, and remained empty even after they were closed. *Peter Dow* / Dow Software Services, Inc. 909 793-9050 pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> / Barbara Morris wrote:
Jon Paris wrote:>> ... mentions that three file descriptors should be opened in the job
for
Java I/O to work when the JVM is started by the invocation API I notice that in your RPG code Barbara that all files are opened
read/write
whereas the C example only opens null1 that way, the others are write
only.
Is that another error in the C example or doesn't it make any difference
?
Hmm, good catch. I had another version of the program that opened one for read and two for write; I forgot about that when I merged them to use a loop. The new version does seem to fix up the various problems with Java I/O. (I originally wrote it because the os400.stdout and os400.stderr Java properties seemed to be ignored unless the file descriptors were opened before any I/O was done by Java.) I'm not sure if it makes a difference, but I suspect not. I don't think it could be the case that these file descriptors are actually used for stdin, stdout and stderr; I think that for some reason they just have to exist. If they were actually used, you would probably have to ensure (somehow) that file descriptor 0 was stdin (read-capable), 1 was stdout (write capable) and 2 was stderr (write capable).
------------------------------ message: 6 date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:22:29 +0530 from: <paramasivam.murugesan@xxxxxxxxx> subject: Saving spool files in *SAVF I would want to save the spool files for later reference. I saved the outq into a save file using SAVOBJ. While restoring the outq, the spool files are not there.. Anything I am missing? Thanks, Muru. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com ------------------------------ message: 7 date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:11:21 +1000 from: Kevin Wright <Kevin.Wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: RE: Saving spool files in *SAVF V5R4. Regards, Kevin W.
-----Original Message----- From: paramasivam.murugesan@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:paramasivam.murugesan@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 1:52 PM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Saving spool files in *SAVF I would want to save the spool files for later reference. I saved the outq into a save file using SAVOBJ. While restoring the outq, the spool files are not there.. Anything I am missing? Thanks, Muru. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
------------------------------ message: 8 date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:15:26 -0400 from: "Steve Richter" <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: Prometheus On 5/30/06, Jon Paris <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>The p5 is successful and it's system software ( DB2 ) is sold per user. IBM makes money and the customers are buying a lot of p5s. A good deal all around, no? I don't know if it is still true Steve - but for many many years the p series lost money big time. It was the revenues form the I series that
kept
it going. It would not surprise me that much if it was still the case.
http://www.itjungle.com/tug/tug050406-story08.html 1st quarter 2006 sales: xSeries $954 million zSeries $555 million pSeries $733 million iSeries $237 million looks like a reliable report. p5 hardware brings in 3x that of i5 hardware.
I know I'm going to regret asking this - but just what _do_ you like about the System i? I don't recall ever seeing anything in your notes other
than
complaints about the capabilities/horsepower/price/etc.
I remember a job interview some years back and the MIS director guy told me he didnt think I liked the system. It was kind of funny. The next interview the person who interviewed me was pretty smart and I got the job offer. There is a lot I like about it. The ability to do problem determination is excellent on this system of ours. I got a call on friday that a job I had changed had bombed. The operator put everything to the side for me and come tuesday I was able to look at the joblog and pretty easily see what had gone wrong. I am still able to make money coding on the i5. Actually have done more i5 programming in the last 18 months than I had done the 4 yrs before that. I just worry IBM is not improving the system and there is going to be less and less work on it. Let me ask you Jon, have the technical managers in the i5 division ever gone to IBM management and told them that look, you are starving our system of investment and we could sell a lot more systems if we were able to make across the board improvements to the OS, ILE and languages on the system? And the other way around. Does IBM management come down on the technical people and say something like "look how well the .NET framework and CLI language strategy is working for MSFT. Why have you all not been proposing a common framework and language structure for all the IBM platforms? Why did you all not follow thru on ILE?" Just joking, you dont have to answer. It is just that with the huge profits MSFT is achieving from the constant churning of new ideas and products, you would think some large investor or high level executive in IBM would challenge the company to match microsoft's achievements. -Steve ------------------------------ message: 9 date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:58:01 +0200 from: "Hauser, Birgitta" <Birgitta.Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxx> subject: AW: How to have multiple views of subfile data? Hi, we normally use two subfiles that are filled in paralell. When toggeling we either show the first or second one and position to the appropriate subfile row. Option fields are named equally. Mit freundlichen Gr??en i.A. Birgitta Hauser LUNZER + PARTNER GMBH Consulting | Software | Service Carl-Zeiss-Stra?e 1 63755 Alzenau Tel: + 49 6023 951-255 Fax: + 49 6023 951-111 Internet. www.lp-gmbh.com www.rpg-schulung.de -------------------------------------------------------- Handelsregister: Aschaffenburg HRB 4720 Gerichtsstand und Erf?llungsort Alzenau Ust-IdNr.: DE132093146 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Rudolf Gerbert --------------------------------------------------------- -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: midrange-l-bounces+birgitta.hauser=lp-gmbh.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+birgitta.hauser=lp-gmbh.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Wilt, Charles Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 20:59 An: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Betreff: How to have multiple views of subfile data? All, I've gotten a request to put together a subfile program that allows the user to choose between two different views of the data. In one view, each subfile record takes two lines. In the other, each subfile record takes 3 lines. Note that while about 75% of the fields are the same between the views, all the fields on line two of one view don't show up at all on the other view. Kind of like the different "views" IBM provides in the WRKSPLF command for example. I've never had a request like this before, in the past I've always made use of SFLDROP/SFLFOLD. I thought I'd see if anyone had run into this type of request and how you handled it. I've considered having multiple subfiles defined in the DDS. Or perhaps using a single subfile with just one long text field. Unless I'm mistaken, with either of those techniques, it would be easiest to use a page at a time subfile so that I could show the same screen back to the user when they switched views. Perhaps DDS is not the right tool for this request and I should use UIM. Thoughts anyone? Thanks, Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.