|
Heh! Part of the problem even with the HMC is the operators need o see the consoles all the time, so even on our HMC'ed systems we need PC's for them to Telnet (on that annoying port 2300) to the HMC. If there are moe than 4 consoles on a given PC, it's really pretty difficult to see what's going on. We are moving more and more to automation, but still having a console (even if only a PC talking to the HMC) is important. We have that NASA look down, for sure. Jeff Carey Acxiom Corp. Phone: 630-944-0216 Fax: 630-944-8941 Pager: jeff_carey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Vote for me for COMMON Board of Directors: http://www.common.org/about/carey.html -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:59 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: HMC or LAN Console Not bad compared to the several twinax terminals we had to have laying around to support all the terminals going belly up. And I'd hate to see the space used up in a machine room with 24 twinax terminals that could be replaced with 1 hmc. Unless one has a fondness for the NASA look. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.