|
Trevor Trevor Perry wrote:
Ouch! I guess you and Rob need my head to be satisfied..
You lost it in 1540 (see my earlier post)
I did not but I think that any point that this thread once had has been losts in the mists of timeYou missed the point entirely.
I have already said that we should move on and I have other things to do Rob Dixon
Reading the story, I see no reference to development time or what the application was in order to discern an advantage. Nor do I read where I asked the guy to click a button. What is going on here? Being pushed a little too hard? Not reading all the words? No wonder it seems I am crushing something.When you read the story, you might understand that the user's resistance to a mouse was a lie. He was simply resistant to change.A lesson to be learned for the whiners..----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Forlini"Subject: Re: The Perpetual Myth of iSeries ObsolescenceI guess I don't get the point of the story. Was it: 1) You used a bunch of development time to implement a keystroke identical interface to what was already being used to no perceivable advantage, or 2) You got some guy to click a button that he didn't need to click? Regards, - Lou Forlini Software Engineer
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.