|
Isn't the IBM product PC5250, and isn't it part of CA?? Don't worry at all about emulators. They're all stable. Even the ones on thin clients and hand held RF computer/scanners such as CLIs Termpro, LXEs RFterm, or the Wavelink emulator that PSC Falcons use. Doesn't matter whether the OS is CE.net or Windows XP embedded. I do a lot of support and emulator problems are almost non-existent. In fact the 5250 terminals we use on our final assembly lines will be replaced with thin clients through attrition. I find it easier to support a thin client than a remanufactured 5250 terminal that is prone to failure. Like I want to pay $100 for a remanufactured 5250 keyboard when I have many PC keyboards in storage! The thin clients are only $400 and can be configured for emulation only. No shutdown required. Turn it on and off just like a 5250 terminal and all they get is a sign on screen. I have deployed 10 thin clients in our manufacturing plant in the past year, all configured for emulation only - no server required. I'm will to give a demo if you're in the Chicago area. Or talk off list. Bryan Burns ECHO, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Pat Barber [mailto:mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:17 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: Every day emulation It would appear that CA is still the top dog. I have used Personal Communications years ago and had forgot about that. Is that still around in a current version ??? I hadn't heard the term RUMBA in years. I recall that being very popular at one time. Who owns that product today ? Open source is certainly a possibility but I would fret about support in a large install. I saw a copy of Synapse IP and that did look prettty nice. Nobody mentioned the IBM telnet product at all. What about all these "thin client" folks we talked about in an older thread ??? Is anybody using JUST a thin client for everybody ? Pat Barber wrote: > What is the general population using for every > day emulation these days ? > > Is Access for Windows still the emulator of choice ? > > As I recall, most conversations regarding older > versions of CA start with the phrase "I hate that software". > > If it is still hated, what are the other options ? > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.