|
Personally I like to have at least one hard-wired twinax connection that is on the QCTL/controlling subsystem. The rest can be Ethernet/twinax... Joel B. Harvell Food Lion, LLC (704) 633-8250 x2709 jbharvell@xxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James H H Lampert Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:31 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: Twinax? "Gary Kuznitz" <docfxit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > . . . I thought twinax was outdated 10 years ago. . . among other anti-Twinax drivel, some of it quite venomous. I have yet to see a terminal emulator (the one I designed and helped write INCLUDED) that can come close to performing as well (and looking as good) as the real thing. Especially a 3487-HC. Ask not why anybody still uses Twinax, but why IBM would so completely abandon such a robust, practical, user-friendly standard. -- JHHL NOT AMUSED, with TWO Twinax terminals on his desk.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
