|
The problem came about after an upgrade to the latest version. After the upgrade, the system did not work well. The problem was traced to a PTF on a cume released by IBM and installed on our system weeks prior to the upgrade. So the problem was that their new release did not work with the latest IBM PTFs until after they did a PTF of their own. So no, I did not "expect them to get the PTF from IBM and apply it to our system". I expected them to test their new release on a fully up-to-cume system and know if there were issues. And fix them right away (which they did within a week). And not tell me 'Call IBM" but instead tell me "we are working with IBM and will resolve the problem" I want to note that the problem was not catastrophic. One or more of the remote journals would go down at random intervals and had to be manually restarted until the problem was fixed. Restarting it was easy, and notification that the journal was down was automatic, we just had to babysit it for a while. The original question was "Has a HA vendor every told you to 'Call IBM?'" and our answer was Yes. >>> Ron-Zimmerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2/14/2006 9:31:53 AM >>> If the problem is because a PTF is needed from IBM, what else would you expect the vendor to do? It sounds to me like they identified the problem as a missing PTF and told you how to fix it. Do you expect them to get the PTF from IBM and apply it to your system?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.