Re: Design Change Requests -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Design Change Requests
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:32:36 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

A big point to consider is that some people, using FF had no problem with 
that site.  They just used a newer version of FF.  Is it really such a 
PITA to upgrade your browser?  Or is there some business decision to 
remain at ancient versions of the browser in order to test any website you 
design that it is compatible with old versions of FF?  Are there really 
"users", and not web developers, that use something like FF and refuse to 
upgrade to a newer version of FF?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Design Change Requests , Pete Helgren

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.