Re: Disaster Recovery test scenario -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Disaster Recovery test scenario
From: e-tech@xxxxxxx (Rick Aguiar)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:21:11 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree... I've also seen in practice where two restores are done without even 
a validation step as there are know PF/LF issues with names and the files go 
down correct on the second pass...

Sure for small systems this is OK... for those of use running mulitple TB host 
this is not an easy decision or process....
--
E-Tech@xxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Disaster Recovery test scenario , ChadB
Re: Disaster Recovery test scenario , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.