RE: Image Catalogs for Upgrades -- MIDRANGE-L

I eventually did get the image catalog upgrade to run on the 170, after
deleting the PTF image catalogs.  All the images were in different
directories, e.g. /imgclg/upgrade, /imgclg/cumulative and
/imgclg/groups.  I did do the license acceptance prior to the upgrade.

Regards,
 
Scott Ingvaldson
iSeries System Administrator
GuideOne Insurance Group

-----Original Message-----
date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:02:45 +1300
from: Evan Harris <spanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Image Catalogs for Upgrades

Hi Scott

I did a test of the same process on a 170, and I'm pretty sure it was
even the same cume level (C4244520) and that worked fine doing the
upgrade, so I'd guess it's not that.

I didn't figure out at the time how to cause the V5R3 upgrade to
continue and do the whole PTF thing as well although I wanted to (I
still haven't figured out whether this is possible)

One thing that occurs to me: did you load all the files into the same
directory or did you copy them into separate subdirectories ? In other
words, did all the Image Catalogs exist in the exact same directory ?

Also, did you load the PTF required to do the license acceptance thing
in advance of the upgrade ?

Regards
Evan Harris

At 09:44 a.m. 28/10/2005, you wrote:
>Since this topic is being discussed today:
>
>Back in February we upgraded our test box (V5R2 - V5R3) from an Image 
>catalog.  The system was at C4244520 with all of the required Image 
>Catalog and upgrade PTF's.
>
>It appeared that having multiple image catalogs on the system caused 
>the LIC install to hang.  I had the LIC and O/S in image catalog
UPGRADE05.
>I also had image catalogs CUMULATIVE and GROUPS.  The command entered
>was: PWRDWNSYS OPTION(*IMMED) RESTART(*YES) IPLSRC(*IMGCLG)
>IMGCLG(UPGRADE05)
>
>After the LIC installs hung at srcC6004001 (three times) I would IPL 
>and find image catalog UPGRADE05 unloaded from OPTVRT01 and either 
>CUMULATIVE or GROUPS loaded.  After deleting image catalogs CUMULATIVE 
>and GROUPS the LIC install completed successfully and I was able to 
>continue with the O/S install.
>
>Supportline opened a discussion group and their conclusion was that 
>they had never seen this before and that it might have something to do 
>with the system being an older 170.
>
>Two weeks ago I upgraded our prod system, an 810 and ran into the same 
>issue again.  I IPLed, deleted the PTF image catalogs with DLTIMGCLG
>IMGCLG(xxxx) KEEP(*YES) and then completed the upgrade successfully.
>After the upgrade I recreated the image catalogs using CRTIMGCLG
>IMGCLG(CUMULATIVE) DIR('/imgclg/cumulative') CRTDIR(*NO) and ADDIMGCLGE
>IMGCLG(CUMULATIVE) FROMFILE('/imgclg/cumulative/C5207530_01')
>TOFILE(*fromfile)  Since the images were already loaded the add 
>completed in about a second.
>
>
>SupportLine STILL says that they have never heard of this problem from 
>anyone other than me.  One recommendation was to load all of the PTFs 
>in one image catalog rather than two, but they still can't go in the 
>same one as the upgrade images so I'm not sure what difference that 
>would make.
>
>The upgrade completed very quickly using the image catalog, about two 
>hours not counting IPLs.  I like the image catalogs for upgrades; it 
>sure beats standing there swapping CD's all night, but I would like to 
>be able to preload the CUME and groups also.  As far as normal PTF 
>operations go there doesn't seem to be much advantage to image catalogs

>unless you are downloading the ePTF .bin files.  If you use CD's the 
>effort is the same.
>
>My biggest concern here is that the whole idea is to automate the 
>process.  If I have to stand there and watch it then the image catalogs

>are useless to me.  I need to have a reasonable expectation that an 
>image catalog upgrade will complete succesfully.
>
>Has anyone had similar experiences or is this just an id10t error?  I 
>have not seen this behavior documented and SL seems to think that it 
>should not work this way.
>
>Regards,
>
>Scott Ingvaldson
>iSeries System Administrator
>GuideOne Insurance Group