× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Strictly from a ptf perspective and not a WAS perspective, I would think 
yes.  But depending on what group ptf's.  IBM has gotten better on what 
ptf's need an ipl.  They still have a long way to go.  Often it is easier 
to send instructions to do a GO PTF 8 and tell it to IPL than to say, not 
to IPL but then do a APYPTF LICPGM(*ALL) APY(*TEMP) DELAYED(*NO) and hope 
they all IPL.  Complications from that include
- You may run in to some ptf's that do require an IPL and you'll have to 
IPL anyway
- IBM trick of not requiring an IPL, but a particular ptf may require that 
you end so much stuff that you might as well IPL.  Recently I've seen some 
that either require we end TCP/IP or even bring our system into a 
restricted state.  On our systems bringing down tcp/ip means you might as 
well IPL because there isn't a user here who won't notice it.

Resistance is futile.  You will be assimilated.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.