× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. October 2005

RE: SAVLIB and UPDHST(*NO) ... is it faster?

What they might have been thinking about is the Save access paths. Use *NO
and it definitely speeds the save, but the trade off is it slows the
restore. So for what you are doing this might be OK ?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Vidal
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 12:46 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: SAVLIB and UPDHST(*NO) ... is it faster?

Hi guys!

I am in a project were backup speed is crucial.  I am doing SAVLIB over 27 
libraries but one of the guys here told me that if I change the parameter 
UPDHST to be *NO, it will increase the backup speed dramatically.  I am 
doing a regular backup of the libraries on tape every single day and this 
backup event is for one shot only, so I was wondering if I can give it a 
try...

Any pros/cons/comments on this?

TIA,

Peter

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.