× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. September 2005

RE: 520 model debate

Rob,

Great Article.  We are in the midst of looking to upgrade our aging
720-35/240CPW to a 520-1000CPW machine.  Our problem is that our
interactive CPW is often overrun by 100% during production hours
(sometimes we have over 70 interactive users thrashing the system).

We had IBM run their performance analysis tools on our system, and they
recommend we move to an enterprise version of the 520.  Now I have to
try and get that past the executives without too many heart attacks. :)

Brian.

-----Original Message-----
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:21 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: 520 model debate

I did some time trials on upgrading an 820-24AA to a 520-7453.
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200408/msg00644.html

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.