RE: Is Iter passe'?

["Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suspect the original programmer was trying to avoid using a priming read
before the do loop?   Today we'd setll, read, and dow not %eof I believe,
with the next read being just before the enddo.. 
 
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.martinvt.com
---------------------------------
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Date: 05/19/05 16:06:12
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Is Iter passe'?
 
The "Iter" operation definitely isn't passé, what you ought to be trying
to remove is the use of the conditioning indicators instead
 
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jns
Sent: 19 May 2005 20:05
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Is Iter passe'?
 
Hello, I was looking at a programmers code. They have things like
   dou *in99
read filex                 99
           99  Iter
 
How do you remove the use of iter these days?
 
 
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
 
 
.