|
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 14:09 -0600, James Rich wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Walden H. Leverich wrote: > > >> It is true that a 5250 client could be modified to send back any key at > >> all. > > > > Wouldn't display management stop that? I would think (hope?) that the > > workstation manager would see a F8, but it would "know" that F8 wasn't > > valid and stop the request. Is that not the case? > > Good question. To test I ran tn5250 using the trace option (which logs > everything sent between the client and host) and pressed an invalid key. > tn5250 sends the key as entered (so you don't actually have to modify > anything). The iSeries responds that the function key is invalid. So the > validation is done by the host, not the client. Client hacks won't get > you anywhere. I stand corrected. This means that 5250 apps *are* indeed more safe than browser apps because hackers cannot exploit hidden fields and such. Excellent. -- Regards, Rich Current Conditions in Des Moines, IA Overcast Temp 50F Winds out of the North at 21, gusting to 29mph
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.