|
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 09:03, David Gibbs wrote: > R Bruce Hoffman wrote: > > No matter. What I was getting at was is this a mixed DDS and SQL DDL > > schema/library or completely SQL DDL schema? > > In this case, it's an entirely SQL DDL schema. > Ouch! I'm sorry to be thick here... but now I'm really curious/concerned. Ok, so after the restore, did/have you done a WRKPFCST? And are the constraints completely missing or pending? And maybe I missed this... did you restore to the same library name or a different library name? > > And in the case of the completely SQL DDL schema... is it managed by a > > tool or at least by a member/file of DDL statements? > > The schema is managed by the application. > Still not exactly sure what you mean by this. Do you mean that there is some "install/update" program included with the application that creates/modifies the schema? Or is there a separate file/member of DDL statements that is maintained in the application but can still be applied through, say, Client Access or RUNSQLSTM? > david -- "Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same." -- Oscar Wilde
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.